引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 3801次   下载 3471 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
青少年双相障碍Ⅱ型和单相抑郁 的认知功能比较研究
汤义平, 陈倩倩, 陆强, 姜义彬, 许学明, 曹敏敏, 蔡志杰, 王筱芳
台州市第二人民医院心身科
摘要:
目的 比较青少年双相障碍Ⅱ型和单相抑郁症之间认知功能的差异。方法 对54 例青少年双相障碍Ⅱ型和83 例 青少年单相抑郁症患者在抑郁发作时作认知功能测验,包括:中国韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS-RC)、连线测验(TMT)、持续操作测验(CPT)、韦氏记忆量表(WMS-RC)、词语流畅性测验(VF)、威斯康星卡片分类测验- 改良版(WCST),并与50 例健康对照组比较。经过6 周治疗后,对抑郁症状缓解(HAMD≤7 分)患者重复上述认知功能测验。结果 入组时双相障碍Ⅱ型和单相抑郁两组在认知功能方面广泛受损,表现为TMT-A、WAIS-RC 数字符号、CPT、WAIS-RC 数字广- 倒背、WAIS-RC视觉再生、VF、WCST 和TMT-B项目上与健康人群相比明显成绩差,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01),但双相障碍Ⅱ型和单相抑郁两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗6 周后,对两组临床痊愈的患者重复测验,发现两者在WAIS-RC 数字符号和WAIS-RC 视觉再生方面存在持续性损伤,与健康对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。双相障碍Ⅱ型患者在CPT 项目上存在损伤,与健康对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。而单相抑郁症患者表现为VF和TMT-B 项目上存在损伤,与健康对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 双相障碍Ⅱ型和单相抑郁在抑郁状态时,认知功能广泛受损,两者比较无统计学差异。在抑郁症状缓解后,双相障碍Ⅱ型表现为持续性注意 功能障碍,而单相抑郁表现为执行功能障碍。
关键词:  双相障碍Ⅱ型  单相抑郁症  认知功能  持续性注意  执行功能
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:浙江省医学会临床科研基金项目
Cognitive function in adolescents with bipolar disorder-Ⅱ or unipolar depression
TANG Yiping, CHEN Qianqian, LU Qiang, JIANG Yibin, XU Xueming, CAO Minmin, CAI Zhijie, WANG Xiaofang
Taizhou Second People's Hospital
Abstract:
Objective To compare the cognitive function in adolescents with bipolar disorder-Ⅱ and those with unipolar depression. Methods Fifty four adolescents with bipolar disorder-Ⅱ (bipolar group), 83 adolescents with unipolar depression(unipolar group) and 50 healthy adolescents (control) were enrolled in the study. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale(WAIS-RC), Trail Making Test(TMT), Continuous Performance Test (CPT), Wechsler Memory Scale(WMS-RC), Verbal Fluency(VF) and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) were performed in all subjects, the tests were performed again after 6 weeks of treatment and patients experienced remission(HAMD≤7), Results Before treatment the TMT-A, WAIS-RC numerical symbols, CPT,WAIS-RC digit span subtest, WAIS-RC visual reproduction, VF, WCST and TMT-B scores in patients were worse than those in healthy controls (P<0.01). However, there were no significant differences between bipolar and unipolar groups (P>0.05). After six-week treatment, there was still significant difference in WAIS-RC numerical symbols and WAIS-RC visual reproduction between patients and healthy groups(P<0.05). The bipolar patients had difficulty in CPT, compared to healthy group(P<0.05), while the abilities of VF and TMT-B in unipolar patients were still lower compared to healthy group(P<0.05). Conclusion The cognitive function in adolescents with bipolar disorder-Ⅱ or unipolar depression is generally damaged. At the remission of the disease bipolar patients have difficulty in sustained attention, while unipolar patients show the decline of executive function.
Key words:  Bipolar disorder-Ⅱ  Unipolar depression  Cognitive function  Sustained attention  Executive function