引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 3553次   下载 3179 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
经后路伤椎置入椎弓根螺钉短节段固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的生物力学研究
吴冰, 吴天泉, 程德良, 单方军, 徐学方, 曹志军, 谢兴平, 沈良
绍兴市中西医结合医院脊柱外科
摘要:
目的 探讨经后路伤椎置入椎弓根螺钉短节段固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的生物力学稳定性及刚度。 方法 取 15 具新 鲜猪骨胸腰段椎体(T11~L3)标本,随机分为跨节段双椎间 4 枚椎弓根螺钉固定组(4 钉固定组)、经伤椎单侧椎弓根螺钉固定组(5 钉固 定组)、经伤椎双侧椎弓根螺钉固定组(6 钉固定组),每组 5 具,建立胸腰椎爆裂性骨折模型,对 3 组标本进行后路短节段跨节段椎弓 根螺钉固定或经伤椎椎弓根螺钉固定,测试 3 组标本在正常、骨折、固定、疲劳状态下的前屈后伸、左右侧屈的运动范围(ROM)以及生 物力学刚度。 结果 3 组标本的固定方法均能提高胸腰椎骨折模型的生物力学稳定性及刚度;生物力学刚度方面,5 钉固定组、6 钉 固定组均明显高于 4 钉固定组,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05),5 钉固定组与 6 钉固定组之间比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);运动范围方面,5 钉固定组与 6 钉固定组在前屈后伸、左右侧屈 4 个方向的 ROM 均明显低于 4 钉固定组,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05),5 钉固定组与 6 钉固定组之间比较差异无统计学意义 (P >0.05)。 结论 经后路伤椎置入椎弓根螺钉短节段固定可提高 胸腰椎骨折模型各个运动方向上的生物力学稳定性及刚度,但经伤椎单侧与双侧椎弓根钉固定在刚度及稳定性方面无统计学差异。
关键词:  胸腰椎骨折 生物力学 伤椎置钉
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:绍兴市卫生科技计划项目
Biomechanical evaluation of posterior short-segment pedicle at the injured level for thoracolumbar spine fracture
WU Bing, WU Tianquan, CHENG Deliang, Shan Fangjun, XU Xuefang, CAO Zhijjun, XIE Xingping, SHEN Liang
ShaoXing Municipal TCM integrated Western Medicine Hospital
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the biomechanical properties of posterior short-segment pedicle at the injured level for thoracolumbar spine fracture. Methods Fifteen fresh porcine spines (T11~L3) were randomized into3 groups with 5 in each, which were subject to traditional short-segment pedicle screw fixation(4-screw construct), unilateral pedicle screw fixation at the injured level (5-screw construct) and bilateral pedicle screw fixation at the injured level (6-screw construct), respectively. The vertebral compression fracture was performed in the L1 vertebra body of the 3 groups. The range of motion (ROM) and biomechanical stiffness were tested in the normal state, fracture state and the fixed state. Results The biomechanical stability and the biomechanical stiffness of thoracolumbar fracture were improved by the fixed methods in all 3 groups. The improvement of 5-screw fixation and 6-screw fixation were significantly superior to that of 4-screw fixation in both biomechanical stiffness and range of motion (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between 5-screw fixation and 6-screw fixation (P >0.05).Conclusion Posterior short-segment pedicle at the injured level for thoracolumbar spine fracture can improve the biomechanical stability and stiffness in the thoracolumbar fracture model, however, there is no significant difference between unilateral pedicle screw fixation and bilateral pedicle screw fixation.
Key words:  Thoracolumbar spine fracture Biomechanical propetries pedicle pedicle Screw fixation at the injured level