| 摘要: | 
			 
		     | 目的比较双镜联合(LECS,即腹腔镜联合胃镜)与开腹手术治疗胃间质瘤(GST)的疗效与安全性。方法检索公开发表的有关LECS(LECS组)与开腹(OPEN组)手术治疗GST的疗效与安全性比较的文献,按纳入标准筛选文献,并进行质量评价后,对提取的临床效应指标进行Meta分析。结果共纳入16篇文献,共1139例患者,其中LECS组578例,OPEN组561例。Meta分析结果显示:与OPEN组比较,LECS组患者术中出血量少(WMD=-62.01,95%CI:-67.91~-56.10,P<0.05)、术后肛门排气时间早(WMD=-48.76,95%CI:-63.08~-34.43,P<0.05)、术后进食时间早(WMD=-1.71,95%CI:-2.21~-1.22,P<0.05)、住院时间短(WMD=-4.28,95%CI:-5.24~-3.33,P<0.05)、术后并发症发生率低(OR=0.17,95%CI:0.10~0.28,P<0.05),而手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论LECS手术治疗GST安全、有效。 | 
			
	         
				| 关键词:  胃间质瘤  腹腔镜  胃镜  开腹手术  Meta 分析 | 
			 
                | DOI:10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2017.39.24.2016-1691 | 
            
                | 分类号: | 
			 
             
                | 基金项目: | 
          |  | 
           
                | Efficacy   and   safety   of   laparoscopic   and   endoscopic   cooperative   surgery   versus   open   resection   for   gastric   stromal   tumors:   a meta-analysis | 
           
			
                |  | 
           
		   
		   
                | Huzhou Central Hospital | 
		   
             
                | Abstract: | 
			
                | Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery(LECS) for gastric stromal tumors (GST) by systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods The literature comparing LECS and open resection (OPEN) for GST was searched from several international online databases. After screening for inclusion, quality assessment, and data extraction, meta-analysis was conducted. Results Sixteen studies were included for meta-analysis, involving 1 139 patients with GST, of whom 578 cases with LECS and 561 cases with OPEN for treatment. Compared to OPEN, LECS experienced lower intraoperative blood loss (W MD=-62.01, 95%CI: -67.91--56.10, P<0.05), shorter time of postoperative flatus(WMD=-48.76, 95%CI: -63.08--34.43, P<0.05), earlier postoperative feeding(W MD=-1.71, 95%CI:-2.21--1.22, P<0.05), shorter length of hospital stay (W MD=-4.28,95% CI:-5.24--3.33, P <0.05), and less postoperative complications (OR=0.17, 95% CI: 0.10-0.28, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in operative time between two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for resection of gastric stromal tumors is safe and effective. | 
	       
                | Key words:  Gastric  stromal  tumor   Laparoscopy   Endoscopy   Open  surgery   Meta-analysis |