引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 5710次   下载 3806 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
意识模糊评估方法在痴呆患者中应用的信效度
干雪琴, 张文武, 王伊娜, 潘彬斌, 冯蕾, 周东升
宁波市康宁医院九病区
摘要:
目的研究意识模糊评估方法中文修订版(CAM-CR)在住院痴呆患者中的适用性。方法使用CAM-CR评定住院老年痴呆患者174例,通过因子分析评估该量表的结构效度,以DSM-IV谵妄诊断标准为金标准,评价问卷的诊断效度。通过评定者一致性检验、内部一致性检验评价量表的信度。结果因子分析剔除2个条目后形成9个条目的2因子模型;诊断谵妄的临界值为24分,灵敏度0.97,特异度0.89,与临床诊断的一致性系数Kappa值0.74。CAM-CR条目和总分的评定者一致性组内相关系数(ICC)在0.80~0.91;CAM总量表的内部一致性Cronbacha系数为0.71,2个因子的a系数为0.75、0.69。结论CAM-CR在老年痴呆患者中有较好的效度和信度,适用于老年痴呆患者叠加谵妄的筛查。
关键词:  意识模糊评估方法 痴呆 效度 信度
DOI:10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2017.39.9.2016-2141
分类号:
基金项目:宁波市医学科技计划项目
Reliability and validity of Confusion Assessment Method Chinese Revision applied in dementia patients
GAN Xueqin, ZHANG Wenwu, WANG Yina, PAN Binbin, FENG Lei, ZHOU Dongsheng
Ningbo Municipal Kangning hospital
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the applicability of Confusion Assessment Method Chinese Revision (CAM-CR) in hospitalized dementia patients. Methods The delirum status of hospitalized dementia patients was assessed with 11 item CAM-CR. The structural validity of the scale was evaluated by using the factor analysis; the diagnostic validity of the scale was evaluated using the DSM-IV diagnostic criterion for delirium as the gold standard. The reliability of the scale was evaluated by the internal consistency test and consistency test of evaluators. Results The factor analysis eliminated two items, then two factors model CAM scale was formed. With 24 points as the cut-off value for diagnosis of delirium, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 and 0.89, respectively; the coefficient Kappa value of clinical diagnosis was 0.74. The consistency ICC for the entries and the total score of the CAM-CR was between 0.80~0.91; the Cronbach-α coefficient of the total CAM was 0.71, the Cronbach-α coefficient of the two factors was 0.75 and 0.69. Conclusion The revised CAM has good reliability and validity, which is suitable for the screening delirium in dementia patients.
Key words:  Confusion Assessment Method Dementia Reliability Validity